- Most Recent | Since 2004
- List View
- Archive
- June 10, 2009
Spackling My Brand Identity: New Website Header!
June 10, 2009Read moreOne of the great sins of my personal branding effort has been to let a temporary photograph stand in as my website identity for so long. If you’re reading this article through RSS you missed the new header image that has replaced the old collection of scotch bottles. I just didn’t see the bottles anymore because I’m too close to the website, but every once in a while someone comments that they just assumed that my website is about drinking. I’ve resisted changing it until now, because I liked the photo, but I’m finally starting to define my design methodology and the image is incongruous with respect to a respectable practice. It’s time to put my childish preferences aside.
The visual history of my website header is documented in my post Inadvertent Branding, but the short version of the story is that the bottles (see below) were a joking commentary on my cavalier attitude about moving my website between servers, live, without doing a whole lot of testing. At the time I was also rather fond of the colors in the image, taken with my previous-previous digital camera (a Canon PowerShot G2). Looking at the image now, I can see the nasty contrast issues. Check it out, preserved below for posterity:
The picture in the new header was taken at Starbucks with the 40D to illustrate a blog post, and was serving as (wait for it) a placeholder in my new website design. The new design, sadly, has not been going anywhere since January, so I decided to just grab the image from it. At least the new photo is somewhat informational in its subject matter. Plus, it has my two favorite pens in it (a Lamy Safari and Al-Star) laying on my favorite notebook (a Cachet Classic Graph). The eventual plan is to shoot a new header image depicting a ton of my favorite bits of gear used in support of my identity and design agency philosophy. But first, I’ve got to write it. So for now, this header will serve as a transitional brand image. That probably is some kind of no-no, but as I am also in a transition period, I am allowing for poetic license. So there. So much for growing out of my childish preferences.
Another transitional element I’ve deliberated added is the shift in colors toward the orange-blue palette that my latest business card is using:
The evolution of my business cards has never really matched the evolution of the website, but there’s no more excuses now that I’m settling in a “design niche” I think is suited to my peculiar skillset and personality. To help, I’m using some language from the cards (“investigative designer”) while retaining some of the keywords that the site has become known for (“productivity”). I also am using the gestalt dot story as a bullet for the design portfolio” button, which is now a little more obvious than before. I’m not sure if I like the bullet, but at least we’re starting to get some repetition of elements between the business card and the website, which helps make it seem more like a “brand”. It’s not great consistency, but then again my so-called brand identity has always been somewhat “ambient” as opposed to “direct”. Certain elements like proportions in my design work, color choice, typography, and use of photography have been fairly consistent over the past few years. The explicit use of my name has also been consistent; I demoted the original name of the blog, Better Living through New Media, to a subheader quite some time ago. This probably was a lucky decision, as I’ve discovered that I really do prefer to engage with people one-on-one, representing me-as-me.
So that’s that. I’m giving myself another 10 years to fix the rest of it :-)
- June 7, 2009
Groundhog Day Resolution Review 6-6-2009: Two New Personal Rules of Thumb
June 7, 2009Read moreIt’s been a pretty BUSY couple of weeks since officially finishing my last project, but it’s difficult to say exactly what I’ve been doing. Even more strange is that I’ve felt very productive despite the lack of progress on many of my long-standing business goals; I would say I’m in a happy haze of non-planned productivity, guided by a sense that I’m on the right track. In fact, I completely forgot to do my Groundhog Day Resolutions review on the 6th, which is something I usually remember when I’m feeling kind of anxious about my productivity. In last month’s GHD review, I made the following statement of purpose:
[…] My best guess: be a universal designer with a transparent process built upon three core ideas:
- storytelling as a driving design element
- the use of investigative reconstruction in the discovery phase of the design process.
- audience-validated scientific creative methodology
The original plan was to write up a lot of process documentation and build-out a section of the website to link it all together. The expectation was that this would make it easier for prospective clients to see what I could do and how I approached the work. What I ended up doing instead was spend a lot of time talking to other entrepreneurs in a group I founded called The Collective. And to my surprise, I’m finding that this experience has helped cement my ongoing business strategy to what may be my essential talent: connecting stuff together.
assembling a collective
“The Collective” is a group of local people that I thought should get to know each other because I thought they all had a similar “energy”. Here’s the current mission statement, slightly revised because I can’t help but edit stuff on-the-fly:
- To discover what’s hidden and inspiring in our local community, sharing the best and weirdest nuggets with people who really need and want to know.
- To connect individuals with the desire to bring ideas to life with an audience of supportive, talented, and eclectic peers.
After getting back from Taiwan, it was really important to me to start having regular meetings again. What I like about our meetings is that the purpose is no more than bringing people actively in the moment of facing a personal challenge, and yet everyone comes away with some useful nugget of information, idea, or insight that somehow begets more action. It is similar to the effect that I got from my old New Media Group (now defunct), but this group is explicitly designed around a core of sharing stories about our current actions, as opposed to being about a specific technology or professional field.
What I learned from the New Media Group holds true with The Collective: it doesn’t take very much to create a group beyond volunteering to meet with people. By default, that makes you the leader, and after that it’s all about the interest you can pour into the membership. What makes a group viable is finding the core participants that also add energy to the group; without that, the group will not be self-sustaining or fun. Since this group formed based on recognizing that there were people I knew who already had the right temperament, we started out with a strong core.
In the past, I would have said that finding people that really click together is an extremely improbable event, requiring a lot of luck and a favorable locale in a creative urban environment. But by applying the second rule, you can attract them.
create value every day, and make sure people see it
You’ve heard the expression that “results matter”, and not surprisingly a lot of energy goes into making sure that those results don’t get screwed up. We spend a lot of time agonizing about perfectionism, best practices, process, and correct decision making.
Now, I happen to love all that stuff, and when it’s time to get focused and produce this is an attitude that is good to have. However, if you are trying to grow your opportunities (which as a freelancer, I surely desire), then focusing on perfecting your processes isn’t going to help because that’s stuff that is hidden or unparsable to your prospective audience, who are not experts in your field. So the obvious move is to properly explain it, which is a good thought but ultimately wrong. Spending a lot of time talking about process, scrambling to findi the right superlatives to conceptually frame your excellence in the marketplace, may make you sound competent but it doesn’t create the impulse to buy. It merely creates the opportunity for you to continue to try to convince people that you can do what you say you can do, and that you are who you say you are.
The other way to do it is for people to come to you because of something they have seen, or through word of mouth. Something so intriguing that they have come to seek you out to inquire after it. This is, I think, the ideal scenario. The question is how to get there.
In the very first Printable CEO™ form, The Concrete Goals Tracker, I emphasized that for any of my actions to move my business forward, they had to fulfill the two criteria of tangibility and being seen. If your activities don’t produce something tangible that is seen by someone other than yourself, they are supportive (which is productive) or a waste of time as far as your goals are concerned.
After spending the past few years creating productivity forms based on this idea, I’ve come to the conclusion that opportunity comes from the pursuit of just two actions:
- Creating something I can see, touch, or evaluate with my own senses
- Actively making the effort to show what I’ve made to the people around me
I remember once asking a fine artist painter what they hoped to “achieve” with their work. He looked at me funny, knowing that I was an ignorant engineer who had somehow tricked his way into Art School, and said that he was happy for the audience to provide their own interpretation. He was creating a work that would encourage new thoughts, making connections between experiences they’ve had with the piece that he had created for his own mysterious purposes. The art, for him, was in the interaction. And so it is also with creating tangible artifacts to share; people will find their own uses and bring their own interpretations with them. But if they like it and see possibilities for integrating your work into their life, you are in the unique position to offer it. But they have to see it first. And for that to happen, you’ve got to make it and then go out of your way to show it.
Adding the lesson of The Collective to the previous two actions:
- Endeavor to recognize, create and show things that add value to the world and its inhabitants
Without this statement, the tangibility and showing are really just random shots in the dark. I got lucky that some of my writing and projects on this website caught the eye of people, and that experience of having mattered to a few people fired me up to do more. I made sure that what I made mattered to me first, and then I shared them in the hopes that the works would trigger useful applications in whoever happened to come across them. What is new for this month, though, is actively endeavoring to add value to specific people in my local network of entrepreneurs. There is something magical about that which I haven’t completely sussed out; it may just be that people are social creatures, and by creating these bonds I am fulfilling my need for connection. The statement is also, perhaps, the foundation of true design as I would like to practice it.
wrapping up
So what am I planning on doing for the next month until 7/7/2009?
- Continue to hold Collective meetings for local energizing.
- Get involved in other people’s projects by knowing what they are doing (in essence, helping them “show” what they’re making so I can communicate this to other people)
- Resurrect the stalled freelancer network project, but this time I will apply the criteria I describe to create a dossier of freelancers based on my own assessments and personal interviews. I just like to know what’s going on, really, but I also need to know who my go-to developers and designers are. My rolodex is awfuly thin.
- Chip away at the description of what I do, but from a connection-making perspective. I still need good materials that describe what I do,. and that also applies to fixing the website. I’m kind of resigned to this being a long-term project, but with the first three items on this list, I think my motivation will rise because I’m immersing myself into the business of others.
Dave out!
- June 3, 2009
Indigo Kelleigh’s 8-bit Tarot Cards
June 3, 2009Read moreI stumbled upon Indigo Kelleigh’s fantastic Tarot cards some time ago. Based on the popular Rider-Waite deck that’s in widespread use, Kelleigh’s deck is faithfully illustrated using an 8-bit retro computer graphic style. If you grew up with computer games in the 80s and 90s, you know what I’m talking about. Before we had millions of colors and photographic imagery on the desktop, computer artists basically had to work with what amounted to a digital Lite-Brite, hand-picking each pixel and color to create cartoony imagery. It is not unlike creating a mosaic out of tiles, with a very limited color set. People of my generation, however, remember this era of computer gaming fondly because quality games had to rely on good game play and story–or so we game snobs like to believe.
Anyway, Kelleigh’s 8-bit Tarot covers all 78 cards in the Rider-Waite, using the same 256 colors that used to be the standard system palette on the Macintosh. That may sound like a lot of colors, but when you consider that realistic shading can take dozens of colors for each hue, you quickly exhaust your color budget. Experienced computer graphic artists dither colors to create the illusion of intermediate shades of colors; this works well if the resolution of the screen is high enough with photographic imagery. The technique creates a stippled effect that makes connoisseurs of aged computer graphics nod with heartfelt appreciation.
But I’ve prattled on enough…just take my word that these are really cool. The complete set became available recently for sale, and I jumped to snag a couple for my collection of esoterica. Have a look!
They’re not very large cards, slightly smaller than a standard playing card. However, the printing is quite good and is on a nice coated cardstock. The cards also come in a very cool brown box decorated with blocky 8-bit illustrations done in a Victorian (?) style. The mixing of retro 8-bit graphics with retro package design is very cool.
I suspect they will also work just fine as any Rider-Waite deck for Tarot purposes, as Kelleigh’s digital creations are based on the thematic elements that are in Pamela Colman Smith’s original illustrations. You can see the entire card set at Kelleigh’s site. If you’ve got US$30 burning a hole in your pocket, head on over to the lunarbistro store and send the artist some bucks.
- June 1, 2009
Day Grid Balancer: Assessment 1
June 1, 2009Read moreIt’s been a week since I first started trying the new day grid balancer form, and in practice I found that it didn’t quite mesh well with my expectations. Partly this may be due to the long weekend and the surprise visit of one of my best friends, which meant that I didn’t adhere to the daily schedule I’m striving to put into place. Even when factoring that in, I think I can still say with confidence that there are several aspects I didn’t like about the form:
- Filling out the little day balance grid was confusing because my categories didn’t quite fit what I was really doing. They are not named quite right, even for me.
- I wasn’t quite clear on what kind of things I should list. In hindsight I see I was mixing up several categories of task: things I want to “make time” to do, scheduled meetings, and ongoing projects. The sheet is also a little cramped for writing any more than a few words per item, though perhaps this is a good thing.
- I had a tendency to just want to use the day balance grid to just check things off to try to complete the figure, instead of noting time.
In short, I wasn’t very clear myself on how I wanted to use the form, and this might also be due to imprecise expectations. On the other hand, I also knew that the first week run was unlikely to be quite right, which is why I’m doing this review. There were some useful insights:
- There’s something kind of fun about the day balance grid that I like. People have commented it reminds them of Tetris® in its shapes, and perhaps that gives rise to the expectation of fun.
- Merely checking off a box does make me aware of the other areas I could be balancing, which I think is a good thing. The current design of the sheet, however, doesn’t leverage this very powerfully. Perhaps a single larger diagram is the way to go.
- Having notes on what I did every day to achieve balance is very helpful in remembering what I did.
- My mindset was that of achieving balance through completion, not through doing. This may be because I feel I am bootstrapping a lot of projects to get new work lined up, and I perceive a long sequence of intermediate steps that will take time to complete. In other words, I’m “finish fixated”.
That last point regarding completing versus doing is somewhat subtle; I’m thinking that some actions are inherently good because it is about the time spent in the process itself, and other actions are good because they “finish” something that needed finishing. For example, I’m told that fishing is quite relaxing, and that it is not about actually catching a fish and (as I used to presume) getting to eat it. If one is results-focused, then spending lots of time fishing and not catching any fish would be a big waste of time. However, for someone who enjoys the experience of fishing itself, the entire point is to be immersed in the pleasure of the activity itself.
So there are at least two elements of balance that I should be considering:
- Maintaining a healthy variety of achievements, which lead to balance of multiple prerequisites for security and happiness. This the working assumption behind the design of the current form.
- Remembering to engage in both immersive and results-oriented experiences. This is a distinction that is probably important to note.
So what should this form even do?
And even more important is to decide exactly what this form delivers. I’m not really sure yet. If I look inward to see what it is that’s really on my mind, it’s that I transform myself into a higher-performing version of myself so I can get my languishing projects done. Just about all these projects are related to either creating new business machinery or creating new ways of interacting with people en masse, which is also beneficial to me. The net result I expect from completion of these projects is more opportunity, both financially and socially.
So why even worry about balance when there’s so much to do? The assumption I am testing is whether balance leads to consistent productivity. My gut says that this is part of it, and I keep coming across mentions on other blogs and books that seem to confirm this. Consistent productivity in my case is a matter of maintaining consistent momentum and motivation. I know certain activities inspire and energize me, and I know others drain me. When I am not getting things done AND not constantly exposed people energy pre-mixed with optimism, my motivation wanes.
If I leave this balance issue up to chance, then it’s pretty likely that I’ll have inconsistent days of productivity. This may actually be an acceptable choice, but I am also feeling that time is short and I need to get my ass in gear. Hence, the creation of a new form to help me track what I’m doing and improve my mindfulness. Improving mindfulness is, perhaps, the main point behind this form.
I’ll probably take a second pass at this in the coming week. I’m also very curious about other people’s experiences using the form. Feel free to leave a comment, and I’ll try to address the feedback as much as possible in the second draft.
- May 28, 2009
Inka Pen, 1.5 Years Later
May 28, 2009Read moreBack in late 2007 I bought myself an Inka pen, and have been carrying it in my front pants pocket practically every day since.
Every once in a while, I catch myself noticing that the pen still looks good, so I took some macro pictures of it to document how well it has aged. It doesn’t look that different from the time I noted my impressions when it was new.
While it’s held up pretty well, the pen’s shininess has dulled slightly with use. There are a few small scratches from scraping against keys and coins in my pocket, which isn’t surprising since I keep it on my main key chain. So far, it has not malfunctioned or disappeared on me. There are even a few design details that had escaped me before; the machined metal tube has a small groove to catch the blue silicon o-ring that holds the pen in place. It’s still holding the pen securely in its metal sheath after all this time. And more amazingly, the tube hasn’t dented or bent in any way I can see. This is a quality product.
The place I see the most wear is on the end-cap, where you can see a few dings in the plastic. This might be from when I use my teeth to hold the end of the pen when I’m scrambling to juggle numerous items in my hands. But it’s not objectionable. There is also some wear on the key chain ring holder, but I have not yet seen any cracking or other signs of imminent failure. And if it did, the Inka people have a lifetime mechanical warranty on their product.
How it is writing with the pen? Well, it’s a little cramped if you don’t take the time to completely assemble it, and the feel of the ink isn’t going to beat a good rollerball or fountain pen. However, this is the pen that I always have, unless for some reason I don’t have my usual keys with me. And that has proven to be very convenient. Most things that stay in my pockets get destroyed fairly quickly—you should see the sad state of my Moleskine notebooks—but the Inka keeps on rockin’.
!@(images/09/0528-inka05.jpg:F popimg: “Inka Pen Ball Point”)