Blog

  • Groundhog Day Resolutions Review Day 3

    May 5, 2007

    Recap: I’ve been testing a system that I call Groundhog Day Resolutions. The basic premise is that everyone’s too stressed out to take the time to craft decent resolutions on January 1st, so you should take a break and wait until February 2nd. This is of course also Groundhog’s Day, one of my favorite holidays and favorite movies. The second point of Groundhog Day Resolutions (GHDR) is that you revisit them on 3/3, 4/4, 5/5, etc., for periodic review.

    There’s been a few other people who are following through with their GHDRs today; here are mine:

    1. Commit to Deriving Income from Writing and Making Stuff
    2. Build Sustainable Social Networks
    3. Sell a Product This Year

    This is one of the more interesting reviews so far, at least for me. Read onward!

    (more…)

    Read more
    DSri Seah
  • Vent Through Haiku!

    May 2, 2007

    I was following up on Twitter friend Corrie Haffly and came across her Bad Day? Vent with Haiku post. The idea is that when you’re having a bad day, express your pain through the soothing verbal tea that is Haiku. It combines just the right blend of tension with authentic expression, tinged with a responsible amount of subversiveness. And yet…venting through haiku is somehow not mean. Incredible!

    Here is a haiku-ization of a client’s email, from her former workplace:

    I am quite upset At your stupid, sucky, lame Mickey Mouse product.

    It’s just one of several examples. Check it out!

    Read more
    DSri Seah
  • Metal Meets Paper: Lorinator’s Music Practice Form

    May 1, 2007

    Lori Linstruth, aka Lorinator, wrote me to tell me about this guitar practice form that she created. Lori is a melodic metal guitarist who gets asked a lot how she got to be so awesome; she writes:

    I get a surprising amount email from people who want my advice about how to practice guitar. (That I rarely practice myself doesn’t seem to matter to them.) If the detail of their questions is at all representative, I’m amazed at the amount of mental energy that people can put into finding the optimal guitar practice routine. I don’t think it needs to be that complicated: it seems logical that the keys to gradual, steady improvement on a musical instrument are simple: 1) Decide what you want to play, 2) practice until you can do it, and 3) repeat as necessary.* (*Preferably regularly and at increasing levels of challenge.) It doesn’t need to be more complicated than that. […]

    Paper Makes Practice

    Guitar Practice Diary Lorinator created The ShredTracker to help put our sorry butts in gear. It’s designed to encourage short intervals of frequent practice over a period of time. I’m very impressed at how concisely she expresses the design rationale in her post. The form itself is very clear and attractively laid-out, and a sample filled-out form completes the presentation. Excellent!

    If you won’t take my word for it—which is understandable, since I don’t play an instrument—perhaps one of Lorinator’s mighty arpeggios will convince you otherwise. Check it out:

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=GYY3euo3bUA

    So cool! Read more about The ShredTracker—you’ll find the download links in the post—and rock on! :-)

    Read more
    DSri Seah
  • Passion versus Compulsion: A Case of Mistaken Identity

    April 28, 2007

    I had another one of those shocking shower insights this morning:

    • I am good at organizing, but I am not an organized person by nature.
    • I am good at noticing details, but I am not detail-oriented by nature.
    • I am good at understanding and defining process, but I do not follow the same process every time.
    • I am knowledgeable about productivity and productivity tools, but I am not a systematically productive person.

    Now, I recognize that my definition of “organized” is quite subjective; in relative terms, I may actually be quite organized, detail-oriented, process-driven, and productive compared to other people. However, it’s not how I think of myself. While I have at times molded my behavior to conform to these ideals because it’s what I expect from professionals—these are the credibility markers I look for in competent people—I nevertheless find maintaining such high levels of organization, detail, and process to be very draining. This might explain why I was so “meh” last weekend: I was already tired, and I subconsciously knew I would be drained even further by my “responsible and forward-looking” plans. That’s not much of an incentive.

    This realization puts me in a peculiar bind. One would ordinarily assume that the above subjects, which I write about frequently, are the ones I am passionate about. This is not entirely the case, as a good percentage of it is obsessive compulsion. To be passionate is to be moved because you are filled with powerful emotion (in this context, it’s presumably positive emotion). Compulsion is something else; it’s what you have to do because you can’t not do it. This is NOT always a good feeling; satiating a compulsion is more about alleviating pain, not feeling joyful. While I am capable of being an organized, detail-oriented person, it’s not something that brings me joy in itself. In fact, I am quite drained by the effort, which isn’t good for long-term sustainability.

    (more…)

    Read more
    DSri Seah
  • Scheming vs Collaborating

    April 24, 2007

    I love the idea of collaboration. It’s such an open, positive-sounding term, harmonizing sweetly with concepts like sharing and cooperation. It’s an idealistic term too; when I close my eyes, I imagine a spring meadow filled with people young and old, their hands linked gladly together. It all sounds so nice. And yet…somehow it isn’t quite me.

    Maybe I’m a product of the old school, born too late in the Digital Revolution to have absorbed the essential optimism of Web 2.0. I certainly can feel it, but it doesn’t run as deep as an older pattern that I identify with, that of the outsider working against the system. In other words: I miss being a schemer, getting together with my co-conspirators to hatch some new head-exploding idea. Maybe this is a natural reaction from having run in “transparency mode” for so long, letting all my intentions and feelings show as plainly as I can.

    Elements of a Good Schemer

    The word “collaboration” has such an agreeable sound. It’s a very bright, mature-sounding word, just what you’d need to craft that great team slogan. It smacks of open communication and transparency. I have to admit, though, that I feel a greater connection to the schemers. Maybe it’s because the word “collaboration” sounds so darn responsible and adult, and I’m feeling like I need to have some fun. While I’d take “collaboration” over “hostile opposition” any day of the week, having a co-conspirator is even better.

    It’s a pity that “scheming” is almost universally associated with immoral behavior. Schemers have secrets and are underhanded. Schemers have agendas and talk in whispers. But you know what? Schemers are the ones who are plotting the big exciting things. Now, I’m not promoting terrorism or illegal activity, but I think that there’s something pretty darn cool about defining your goals in opposition to something you feel strongly about. This is a form of passion. Sometimes, these passions must be nurtured in secret before they are strong enough to stand on their own and face the light.

    So what does one expect from a good “co-schemer”?

    • A co-schemer buys into your idea completely, because it’s their idea too.
    • A co-schemer is passionate about “the cause”.
    • A co-schemer is a natural catalyst to other co-schemers, generating energy
    • A co-schemer has your back when things go all pear-shaped.

    By comparison, a good collaborator focuses on slightly different things:

    • A collaborator contributes their piece to a whole
    • A collaborator is passionate about collaborating with people
    • A collaborator keeps a project going by adding their piece
    • A collaborator focuses his attention on the project

    I’m seeing a kind of emotional vs rational duaity here: schemers are passionate about doing, and collaborators are reliably productive. It’s pretty clear to me that you need both to find the perfect partner in crime. Up to now, I think I have been mostly focusing on the elements of a good collaborator (rational). I haven’t really thought about scheming as a necessary component.

    Scheming Checklist

    What should you look for in a good schemer?

    • They laugh at your obscure jokes
    • They are serious about The Cause, but not so serious that they can’t joke about it
    • They are able to “keep up”
    • You find yourself talking constantly about The Cause with them
    • You prod each other into results-producing action.
    • They happily celebrate every result with you
    • They can readily envision and communicate what the world would be like when The Cause comes to fruition
    • They leave you feelingl energized, not drained

    Finding a co-schemer is more difficult, because you’ll have to make yourself vulnerable by broadcasting your crazy ideas, risking ridicule. But you know, it’s totally worth it: I met one of my best friends in the 10th grade while we were moving some boxes around for a school fair. We found that we were both interested in computers, and for some reason I offhandedly mentioned that I could imitate the sounds a disk drive made when booting a favorite game. Which I proceeded to do. Result: life-long friend and former game company startup co-conspirator. To find these people, you’ve got to take some chances. When you find the right co-schemer, the universe will be a more joyful place.

    Why Scheming?

    So what is it about scheming that’s so attractive? For me, it’s the challenge of surprising the status quo by introducing my own ruleset. Schemers pit themselves against the world, seeking to change it through extraordinarily clever ways. It’s a counter-cultural attitude to have, and you need to have a LOT of that attitude if you want to effect really big changes. Otherwise, it’s far easier to just go along with what’s going on. Everone else is doing that already. To scheme is to see the whole of life as something that you can change by changing the rules. It takes a special person to recognize that.

    In Conclusion

    That’s all I really have to say on the subject. If you’re stuck on some particular part of your life, maybe you need someone to scheme with. It’s no fun scheming alone…you need someone who both has the ability and skills, AND the right kind of crazy to match your own. If we were all in the same room I’d make everyone pick a Scheming Buddy. I certainly can use a few now. In lieu of making disk drive noises (I can see the young’uns out there scratching their heads, wondering what the heck I’m talking about), I will just point potential applicants to My Gauntlet of Productivity, which is the dorkiest thing I’ve put online. Are you this kind of crazy? Can you top it? If so, I think we had better talk. :-)

    Read more
    DSri Seah