A Quick Tour of Visual Studio

970-1015-vcs-title.jpg I catching up with Peter, who among other things teaches an Introduction to Visual Basic at Endicott College. I commented, as I do every time we meet, that I should really look into VB because there’s actually quite a lot of work being done in this environment. There are a lot of “real applications” are being done in VB. I’m not sure if there are more than for Flash; a quick visit to Monster.Com showed a 3:1 demand for VB coders versus Flashers, at least here in my neck of the woods.

Warming further to the subject, Peter showed me how to create a skeleton application in Visual Basic .NET. The entire intro took about 10 minutes, more or less. The amazing thing is that this is all I needed to get enough of a grasp of the environment to know what to do next. I imagine that any experienced Actionscript coder could pick it up and start screwing around.

Warning! Geeky notes follow!

Getting Started

Assuming you’ve got Visual Basic .NET 2003, create a new Visual Basic .NET Project. Then follow along with this diagram: it points out the bits of the Visual Basic IDE that are helpful in just getting something to happen on the screen. Go ahead…click to make it bigger!

What is What

Step 1: After you name and create the project, you’ll be presented with a default Form (here named “Form1”) which is the main application window. In ActionScript terms, you can think of it as the “_root movieclip”. I suppose you can eventually create and manipulate other form windows, as you can with commands like MovieClip.createEmptyMovieClip() in Actionscript. I haven’t gotten that far :-)

Step 2: You can select a number of components from the left panel. Some of them are visual objects like buttons and textboxes. Others are non-placed objects, like the FileOpenDialog or Timer objects. Once you select a component, you can draw them on the Form you started with in Step 1.

Visual Basic EditingStep 3: To actually write code, you double-click the component, which will open up the code snippet for you to edit. Peter just attached some code to the Button (here, Button1) that sets the Text property of the object Label1 to something else. Conceptually, it’s just like what you’re used to in ActionScript: you’re basically writing an OnPress handler to set the Text property of a TextBox instance.

Running!Step 4. To run your program, go to the DEBUG menu and choose either START (F5) or START with DEBUGGING (CTRL-F5). Voila! You’re rockin’!

Inspecting Properties

Here’s some other useful things to know:

  • Selecting a component with a single click will show you its properties in the Property Window, assuming you have it showing. One of the buttons in the upper right of the screen (marked as “important windows” in the diagram) will bring up the property window. On the diagram, the green info boxes call these features out.

  • Double-clicking a component will show you the default event handler for that object. This is where you write your code. For example, double-clicking a Button will show you its “click handler”. There are more handlers, of course, which you can discover by using the various tool-tip and auto-completion tools.

  • You can further explore the various object properties and methods avaiable by using the Class Browser and Object Browser windows. On the diagram, the pink info boxes point out the areas you can click.


p>##Off and Running!

Congratulations, you’ve made a real Windows app! Except it doesn’t really do anything, but the Visual Studio Integrated Development Environment (IDE) is very large and very interesting to explore. Now that you know how to create and run a simple program, you have a foundation for exploring the rest of the IDE. The copious tool tips, context-sensitive help, and thousands of articles on the Microsoft Development Network now have some relevance to your existence! This is what a real IDE looks like, BTW. You’ll see that the editor supports code folding, which is wonderful. And the debugger is actually useful.


One drag is that your Visual Basic .NET app needs the (surprise!) .NET runtime, which kind of sucks because it’s feckin’ gigantic…22MB! Sigh. And I really have no idea what it is exactly, but it makes the smooth deployment of your application a pain in the butt. Flash provides a much cleaner deployment experience, plugin-detection code aside. Unless you’re deploying on CD-ROM as a stand-alone projector–ugh.

The introduction of .NET has lead to a balkanization of the Windows Programming APIs, which makes things confusing and has kept me from seriously pursuing PC development; there’s just way too much stuff you have to know to get anything to happen.

Recently, however, I’ve come to believe that just making stuff is probably more important than total comprehension or programming elegance. In other words, I should just make something and worry about elegance later. Visual Basic .NET, though it feels a bit wizardy and bloated, will at least get me familiar with the Windows API in small, digestable chunks. I am fighting the desire to first put together a comprehensive API overview to get that “big picture” view so lacking in most code documentation; I wonder who the equivalent of Moock is on the Windows Dev side of things. THAT would be helpful.

But it’s still BASIC…

I know, I know…BASIC? WHY BOTHER? It’s been years since I’ve had to program in BASIC, and I don’t really have a desire to start learning now; I’ve pretty much imprinted on C++ / JavaScript. The closest thing that I’ve had to use in recent memory was Lingo, which borrows its verbose and sometimes-ambiguous syntax from HyperTalk. Ugh. Don’t get me started.

BASIC itself is still kickin’ around in other interesting incarnations:

Visit Real Basic SiteOne noteable product is REALBasic, which was popular in some education research circles as a rapid development tool, and is now taking on Visual Basic as the crossplatform choice for rapid application development. I last looked at it three or four years ago, and the Windows side did not seem as stable as I would have liked. I hear it’s greatly improved these days, and they’ve added Linux to the list of supported platforms. It’s priced comparably to Visual Basic for Windows: $99 for the Standard edition (free on Linux), $399 for the Pro version.

Star WraithThen there’s Dark Basic, which is a game development BASIC for Windows. You can create 3D game worlds with this package, all for a mere $49. If you want to get into a language that allows you to actually make stuff right away. And therein lies the power of BASIC: you can do stuff right away, without all the tedious mucking about with compilers, linkers and what have you. I should dig up my license and upgrade to the latest version.

Those look cool, but…

Yeah, I wasn’t entirely convinced either, so I tried out Visual C# (pronounced “C-sharp”) and Visual C++ to see how they handled the .NET side of things; Visual C# in particularly has both Java-like syntax and the Visual Basic style interface.

Check out and compare these screenshots; just look at the window title to remind you which language you’re looking at:

Visual C#: Form and Edit Views (“Windows Application Project”) FormForm

Visual C++: Form and Edit Views (“.NET Windows Form Application”) FormForm

And for comparison again with Visual Basic… Visual Basic: Form and Edit Views (“Windows Application Project”) FormForm

They’re all very similar, so if you want to get the flexibility of Visual Basic I suppose you can just start with C#. I think C# is a .NET-only framework, but I’m not entirely sure. Visual Basic may also have a lot more code modules available for it in the form of COM components (the precursor to .NET). I’m trying to get some people together locally to attack the learning challenge as a group. Like I need another project, but development of real software is one of my long term goals. I dunno why…I just like the feel of a solid desktop application. It probably has something to do with my increasing age and fading attention span…why, back in my day, we had to hand-assemble our opcodes on 8-bit processors, with only 3 registers and…Zzzzz.


  1. Beth 12 years ago

    The thing I hate about the whole Visual Studio IDE is how expensive it is to deploy, but I guess any high-end enterprise solution is. 

    Anyhow Lingo is a terrible dinosaur, and I fear it will be abandoned and never improved upon.  It’s unfortunate, because for non-web solutions I find it preferable to Actionscript.

  2. Dave 12 years ago

    I do sort of miss Director at times. I’d like to keep up-to-date with it, but it’s even MORE expensive than Visual Studio. The last version I had licensed was 4.0. If I were doing stand-alone projector work, I’d probably get back into it because it is more cross-platform friendly than Flash. The addition of the Javascript syntax to Lingo sounded very cool.

  3. Beth 12 years ago

    At least the MX version of Director will let you export a projector for Mac or PC, in the old versions you had to own a copy for each!  Double expensive, double stupid.

  4. Joshua 12 years ago

    Nice visual! How did you make that (the first one, the one with numbering and textboxes)?

  5. seuss 12 years ago

    I’m curious if anyone is familiar with OZEXE as a language / dev platform?

  6. Dave 12 years ago

    Josh: I just took a screen capture and made a bunch of boxes with Photoshop Layer Effects! One layer had the boxes with drop shadow, another had the circles with a thick inner stroke applied to it. The text is just photoshop text laid on top of it. If I’d known there would be so MANY boxes before I started, I would have used InDesign or something :-)

    Seuss: Not familiar with OZEXE…looks interesting though. Will check it out.

  7. Karen 11 years ago

    They just released a standard edition of OZEXE.  This is way better than the old Lite version.

A message from Dave:

I believe we all benefit when we respectfully share our perspectives on common experiences. My house rules are "please be respectful of divergent views" and "enjoy the flow of ideas!"

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *